G3 1652VBW vs SeaArk Mud Runner 170: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1652VBW holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the G3 1652VBW comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170. Over the first five years the G3 1652VBW loses roughly $2,098 while the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 loses about $3,493 — a gap near $1,395.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1652VBW sheds about 13% in year one versus 16% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…