SeaArk Mud Runner 170 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk Mud Runner 170 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180. Over the first five years the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 loses roughly $3,493 while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 loses about $3,692 — a gap near $199.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 sheds about 16% in year one versus 16% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…