SeaArk Procat 240 vs Triton 206 Allure — Depreciation Comparison

SeaArk Procat 240 vs Triton 206 Allure: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk Procat 240 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the SeaArk Procat 240 comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the Triton 206 Allure. Over the first five years the SeaArk Procat 240 loses roughly $10,465 while the Triton 206 Allure loses about $19,800 — a gap near $9,335.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk Procat 240 sheds about 12% in year one versus 19% for the Triton 206 Allure. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…