Lund 2075 Pro V Sport vs SeaArk Rivercat CX200 SC: 5-year value retention (71% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk Rivercat CX200 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the SeaArk Rivercat CX200 SC comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport. Over the first five years the SeaArk Rivercat CX200 SC loses roughly $7,673 while the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport loses about $34,211 — a gap near $26,538.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk Rivercat CX200 SC sheds about 14% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…