Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK vs Shadow Trailers 80316E 3SL GN E 166 LQ — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK vs Shadow Trailers 80316E 3SL GN E 166 LQ: 5-year value retention (58% vs 58%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK comes out ahead, holding about 58% of its value versus 58% for the Shadow Trailers 80316E 3SL GN E 166 LQ. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK loses roughly $15,606 while the Shadow Trailers 80316E 3SL GN E 166 LQ loses about $52,225 — a gap near $36,619.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 2250RK sheds about 9% in year one versus 10% for the Shadow Trailers 80316E 3SL GN E 166 LQ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…