Palomino By Forest River 298RLCW vs Shasta By Forest River 29RK: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Palomino By Forest River 298RLCW holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Palomino By Forest River 298RLCW comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Shasta By Forest River 29RK. Over the first five years the Palomino By Forest River 298RLCW loses roughly $32,665 while the Shasta By Forest River 29RK loses about $14,467 — a gap near $-18198.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Palomino By Forest River 298RLCW sheds about 9% in year one versus 9% for the Shasta By Forest River 29RK. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…