Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH vs Silver Wave 210 Island CC — Depreciation Comparison

Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH vs Silver Wave 210 Island CC: 5-year value retention (78% vs 78%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Silver Wave 210 Island CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Silver Wave 210 Island CC comes out ahead, holding about 78% of its value versus 78% for the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH. Over the first five years the Silver Wave 210 Island CC loses roughly $4,246 while the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH loses about $60,849 — a gap near $56,603.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Silver Wave 210 Island CC sheds about 4% in year one versus 17% for the Kingfisher 3225 GFX PH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…