Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB vs Sonic 167VMS — Depreciation Comparison

Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB vs Sonic 167VMS: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sonic 167VMS. Over the first five years the Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB loses roughly $13,671 while the Sonic 167VMS loses about $7,384 — a gap near $-6287.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Bigfoot Rv 15C 9 5FSSB sheds about 14% in year one versus 6% for the Sonic 167VMS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…