Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS vs Sportsmen By Kz 160RBT — Depreciation Comparison

Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS vs Sportsmen By Kz 160RBT: 5-year value retention (50% vs 50%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS comes out ahead, holding about 50% of its value versus 50% for the Sportsmen By Kz 160RBT. Over the first five years the Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS loses roughly $32,997 while the Sportsmen By Kz 160RBT loses about $13,947 — a gap near $-19050.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kodiak By Dutchmen 2921FKDS sheds about 39% in year one versus 17% for the Sportsmen By Kz 160RBT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…