Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 vs Sportsmobile E 161T Transit 250 — Depreciation Comparison

Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 vs Sportsmobile E 161T Transit 250: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Sportsmobile E 161T Transit 250. Over the first five years the Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 loses roughly $43,381 while the Sportsmobile E 161T Transit 250 loses about $42,790 — a gap near $-591.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sportsmobile E 138T Transit 350 sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Sportsmobile E 161T Transit 250. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…