Sportsmobile R 112T Transit 250 vs Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 250: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sportsmobile R 112T Transit 250 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Sportsmobile R 112T Transit 250 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 250. Over the first five years the Sportsmobile R 112T Transit 250 loses roughly $44,499 while the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 250 loses about $43,757 — a gap near $-742.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sportsmobile R 112T Transit 250 sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 250. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…