Salem By Forest River 393FLT vs Spyder By Winnebago 28SC — Depreciation Comparison

Salem By Forest River 393FLT vs Spyder By Winnebago 28SC: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Salem By Forest River 393FLT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Salem By Forest River 393FLT comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Spyder By Winnebago 28SC. Over the first five years the Salem By Forest River 393FLT loses roughly $16,489 while the Spyder By Winnebago 28SC loses about $16,021 — a gap near $-468.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Salem By Forest River 393FLT sheds about 6% in year one versus 6% for the Spyder By Winnebago 28SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…