Crestliner 1650 Fish Hawk SC vs Starcraft 19 Flex Pro T: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Starcraft 19 Flex Pro T holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Starcraft 19 Flex Pro T comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Crestliner 1650 Fish Hawk SC. Over the first five years the Starcraft 19 Flex Pro T loses roughly $7,858 while the Crestliner 1650 Fish Hawk SC loses about $7,964 — a gap near $106.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Starcraft 19 Flex Pro T sheds about 20% in year one versus 6% for the Crestliner 1650 Fish Hawk SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…