Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ vs Stingray 269DC: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Stingray 269DC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Stingray 269DC comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ. Over the first five years the Stingray 269DC loses roughly $72,916 while the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ loses about $90,057 — a gap near $17,141.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Stingray 269DC sheds about 26% in year one versus 32% for the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…