Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford vs Thor Motor Coach 24F GM 4500 — Depreciation Comparison

Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford vs Thor Motor Coach 24F GM 4500: 5-year value retention (49% vs 49%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford comes out ahead, holding about 49% of its value versus 49% for the Thor Motor Coach 24F GM 4500. Over the first five years the Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford loses roughly $86,451 while the Thor Motor Coach 24F GM 4500 loses about $75,518 — a gap near $-10933.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Thor Motor Coach 24 3 Ford sheds about 17% in year one versus 31% for the Thor Motor Coach 24F GM 4500. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…