Thor Motor Coach EVO 33 1 Ford vs Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500 — Depreciation Comparison

Thor Motor Coach EVO 33 1 Ford vs Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500: 5-year value retention (49% vs 50%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500 comes out ahead, holding about 50% of its value versus 49% for the Thor Motor Coach EVO 33 1 Ford. Over the first five years the Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500 loses roughly $65,751 while the Thor Motor Coach EVO 33 1 Ford loses about $86,906 — a gap near $21,155.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Thor Motor Coach SE22 GM 3500 sheds about 32% in year one versus 12% for the Thor Motor Coach EVO 33 1 Ford. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…