Alumaweld 220 14 vs Tidewater 180 CC Adventure: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumaweld 220 14 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumaweld 220 14 comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Tidewater 180 CC Adventure. Over the first five years the Alumaweld 220 14 loses roughly $10,706 while the Tidewater 180 CC Adventure loses about $10,686 — a gap near $-20.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumaweld 220 14 sheds about 16% in year one versus 9% for the Tidewater 180 CC Adventure. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…