Lowe 1860 SC vs Tracker Pro Guide V 175 Combo: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 1860 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe 1860 SC comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Tracker Pro Guide V 175 Combo. Over the first five years the Lowe 1860 SC loses roughly $7,338 while the Tracker Pro Guide V 175 Combo loses about $8,566 — a gap near $1,228.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 1860 SC sheds about 14% in year one versus 12% for the Tracker Pro Guide V 175 Combo. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…