Keystone Rv 316 RLS vs Viking By Forest River 16SFB — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 316 RLS vs Viking By Forest River 16SFB: 5-year value retention (45% vs 45%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Viking By Forest River 16SFB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Viking By Forest River 16SFB comes out ahead, holding about 45% of its value versus 45% for the Keystone Rv 316 RLS. Over the first five years the Viking By Forest River 16SFB loses roughly $11,085 while the Keystone Rv 316 RLS loses about $50,868 — a gap near $39,783.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Viking By Forest River 16SFB sheds about 22% in year one versus 30% for the Keystone Rv 316 RLS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…