Keystone Rv 179 RB vs Viking By Forest River 17FQS — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 179 RB vs Viking By Forest River 17FQS: 5-year value retention (44% vs 44%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 179 RB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 179 RB comes out ahead, holding about 44% of its value versus 44% for the Viking By Forest River 17FQS. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 179 RB loses roughly $19,131 while the Viking By Forest River 17FQS loses about $17,450 — a gap near $-1681.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 179 RB sheds about 28% in year one versus 14% for the Viking By Forest River 17FQS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…