Arctic Fox 32A vs Wildwood By Forest River 37BHSS2Q — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Fox 32A vs Wildwood By Forest River 37BHSS2Q: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 32A holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 32A comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Wildwood By Forest River 37BHSS2Q. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 32A loses roughly $37,295 while the Wildwood By Forest River 37BHSS2Q loses about $16,175 — a gap near $-21120.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 32A sheds about 29% in year one versus 9% for the Wildwood By Forest River 37BHSS2Q. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…