Cruiser Rv 3116 vs Winnebago 27N Ford: 5-year value retention (45% vs 45%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Winnebago 27N Ford holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Winnebago 27N Ford comes out ahead, holding about 45% of its value versus 45% for the Cruiser Rv 3116. Over the first five years the Winnebago 27N Ford loses roughly $111,965 while the Cruiser Rv 3116 loses about $45,340 — a gap near $-66625.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Winnebago 27N Ford sheds about 13% in year one versus 12% for the Cruiser Rv 3116. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…