Alumacraft Competitor 205 Tiller vs Xtreme 162 Flats: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 205 Tiller holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 205 Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Xtreme 162 Flats. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 205 Tiller loses roughly $6,027 while the Xtreme 162 Flats loses about $3,161 — a gap near $-2866.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 205 Tiller sheds about 8% in year one versus 5% for the Xtreme 162 Flats. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…