Xtreme 1645 vs Xtreme 1654 SS 125 Bottom — Depreciation Comparison

Xtreme 1645 vs Xtreme 1654 SS 125 Bottom: 5-year value retention (53% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Xtreme 1645 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Xtreme 1645 comes out ahead, holding about 53% of its value versus 53% for the Xtreme 1654 SS 125 Bottom. Over the first five years the Xtreme 1645 loses roughly $6,150 while the Xtreme 1654 SS 125 Bottom loses about $6,735 — a gap near $585.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Xtreme 1645 sheds about 16% in year one versus 16% for the Xtreme 1654 SS 125 Bottom. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…