Arctic Cat ZR 120 vs Yamaha SRX 120R — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Cat ZR 120 vs Yamaha SRX 120R: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat ZR 120 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat ZR 120 comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the Yamaha SRX 120R. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat ZR 120 loses roughly $1,924 while the Yamaha SRX 120R loses about $1,886 — a gap near $-38.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat ZR 120 sheds about 23% in year one versus 12% for the Yamaha SRX 120R. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…