Loading the interactive terminal…

Ford Transit Cargo vs Nissan Murano — Depreciation Comparison

Ford Transit Cargo vs Nissan Murano: 5-year value retention (47% vs 47%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Nissan Murano holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Nissan Murano comes out ahead, holding about 47% of its value versus 47% for the Ford Transit Cargo. Over the first five years the Nissan Murano loses roughly $21,919 while the Ford Transit Cargo loses about $21,154 — a gap near $-765.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Nissan Murano sheds about 13% in year one versus 32% for the Ford Transit Cargo. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.