Loading the interactive terminal…

Ford Transit Chassis vs Mazda CX-30 — Depreciation Comparison

Ford Transit Chassis vs Mazda CX-30: 5-year value retention (65% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mazda CX-30 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Mazda CX-30 comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 65% for the Ford Transit Chassis. Over the first five years the Mazda CX-30 loses roughly $9,100 while the Ford Transit Chassis loses about $13,020 — a gap near $3,920.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mazda CX-30 sheds about 3% in year one versus 0% for the Ford Transit Chassis. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.