Loading the interactive terminal…

Lincoln MKT vs Volvo XC90 Recharge — Depreciation Comparison

Lincoln MKT vs Volvo XC90 Recharge: 5-year value retention (47% vs 47%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lincoln MKT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lincoln MKT comes out ahead, holding about 47% of its value versus 47% for the Volvo XC90 Recharge. Over the first five years the Lincoln MKT loses roughly $25,556 while the Volvo XC90 Recharge loses about $38,036 — a gap near $12,480.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lincoln MKT sheds about 11% in year one versus 17% for the Volvo XC90 Recharge. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.